I had both installed in FS9 but only have the QW 757 in FSX. Certainly in FS9 the QW aircraft was better and had fewer bugs which was why I chose not to use the CS one in a FSX. I really like the QW 757 and use it quite frequently.
![Quality wings 757 fsx liveries Quality wings 757 fsx liveries](https://www.airdailyx.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/qw757_1.jpg)
As Bjoern says frame rates are good and another positive point is that it is not too heavy on VAS, which is always a consideration when using FSX. I think Level-D may have one in the pipeline but I am not sure whether that will be developed for FSX or one of the other platforms or when it might become available. Bill Edit: Many aircraft marketed by Just Flight are not developed by them and I think that their FS9 757 was Captain Sim so you may wish to see if CS was also involved in JF's FSX version otherwise you might just be buying something you already have! Edited March 12, 2018 by scianoir.
(Oct 09, 2017, 14:26 pm) jbravo Wrote: Is that the full version or just a crack? 466 megs seem large! Based on the file name it is the the full version but cracked. The file is bigger but is compressed to make downloading faster, today that file size is relatively average. Are you looking for quality wings 787 v 1.1??? I got it for p3dv4.3 if thats the one you need let me know so i upload it for you. Hi guys its me again trying to help everyone out. I got it ripped and tested it in another pc and runs great so you should have no problems.
While CS is more PMDG-level? I have many Captain Sim aircraft but I don't think any of them would be considered close to PMDG level! Indeed most of them have quite a few annoying bugs. However, as I haven't experienced their 757 in FSX, it would be unfair of me to criticise it although I would be surprised if it too didn't have its share of bugs. I can say however that I have found the Quality Wings 757, although it is not quite PMDG level, very enjoyable to fly with a fully functional and essentially bug free FMC and sufficient systems functionality to enable me to make many airline type flights without any annoying hiccups! But that is just my personal opinion. Hi, The QW 757 may not be an in-depth simulated aircraft, nevertheless you get a lot of value for its' current price - btw.
All models and engine variants are simulated, you get more than enough liveries, al in all for not more than 25USD (in their own store). You do not need to wait for this one. You cannot make a big mistake purchasing it. The new CS 757 for FSX?
You may need to wait a year or more for it, taking their current pace into account they take for converting their FSX/P3D products to P3Dv4 - prove me wrong CS! The Level-D 757? Since when is that project running.?
If I would not own it already, I would get it. Cheers Frank. If you read my previous posts, you will see that I too recommended the QW757, but suggested that if the OP was going to wait for any 757 he would be better waiting for the Level-D version rather than the Captain Sim version! Bill Yes, Bill, I read all the posts above, including yours and I agree with your perception of the different offers. I just wanted to point out that waiting for a better 757 can become rather long and frustrating.
That's why I suggested to get the QW757 for a good price (and I should have expressed myself less sarcastic). I am a bit frustrated myself since I am waiting for all the long haul aircraft I enjoyed so much in FSX to be re-developed for P3Dv4 since its' release. And there is no sign of them appearing on the horizon. (namely a good 767.) Cheers Frank. Is the CS757 PMDG quality? No, but it does get a bad rap, as users expect it to have similar system functionality as more modern variants.
The thing is CS models both the 757 and 767 as they were when first produced back in the early 80's (Look at the old eggtimer on the overhead ) For example one of the biggest complaints is it doesn't calculate TOD's. You have to remember the 757/767 were the first airliners to even have FMC's and are different then the later variants. You have to either use a transition to the runway or if none is in the NAV DB, you have to define a EOD waypoint, similar to the Q400. Most systems are modelled in the CS757, but are not at the level of PMDG or other high quality developers, but then neither is the QW757 which models even less functions.
The new P3D V4 version just released systems do appear much better, and that should be coming to FSX soon (Hopefully). Is the CS757 PMDG quality? No, but it does get a bad rap, as users expect it to have similar system functionality as more modern variants. The thing is CS models both the 757 and 767 as they were when first produced back in the early 80's (Look at the old eggtimer on the overhead ) For example one of the biggest complaints is it doesn't calculate TOD's.
You have to remember the 757/767 were the first airliners to even have FMC's and are different then the later variants. You have to either use a transition to the runway or if none is in the NAV DB, you have to define a EOD waypoint, similar to the Q400. Most systems are modelled in the CS757, but are not at the level of PMDG or other high quality developers, but then neither is the QW757 which models even less functions. The new P3D V4 version just released systems do appear much better, and that should be coming to FSX soon (Hopefully) Hmm okay.
I wish there was a trial that I could get.